Poll: 63% of Americans Favor Eliminating Qualified Immunity for Police

62% favor limiting police unions’ collective bargaining power; 55% worry criticism of police could drive up crime

Police with Billy Clubs Lined Up
  • Introduction
  • Ferguson Effect?
  • Police Unions
  • Defunding the Police
  • Experience with the Police
  • Perceptions of Excessive Force
  • DOWNLOADS
  • Endnotes
  • Related Content

The Cato Institute Summer 2020 National Survey of 2,000 Americans conducted with YouGov finds that nearly two‐​thirds (63%) of Americans support eliminating qualified immunity so that police officers can be sued for misconduct even if there is no previous legal case with similar facts that ruled officers may not engage in that conduct. Thirty‐​seven percent (37%) oppose ending qualified immunity.

63% Support Eliminating Qualified Immunity for Police Officers

While once a fairly unknown legal doctrine, nearly half (47%) of Americans say they’ve heard about qualified immunity, while 53% say they have not. Those who have heard of qualified immunity are more in favor of ending it (69% favor) compared to those who had not heard of it before (58% favor).

Even in situations where police officers did not know they were breaking the law, Americans say officers should be held accountable. Nearly 8 in 10 Americans (79%) say that if a police officer violates a person’s rights but was “unaware at the time that their actions were illegal” they should be held accountable for that misconduct. Most also believe lawsuits should be on the table. A similar share (77%) say police should not be able to avoid lawsuits for misconduct using ignorance of the law as a defense.

Chart on Ignorance and Misconduct

Majorities of Black (69%), Latino (69%), and White Americans (62%) support eliminating qualified immunity. However, there is a partisan divide. While majorities of Democrats (79%) and independents (64%) support this, a majority of Republicans (58%) oppose ending qualified immunity. Forty‐​two percent (42%) of Republicans support it. Nevertheless, there is non‐​partisan support for the idea behind reforming qualified immunity. Strong majorities of Republicans (64%), independents (75%), and Democrats (91%) say police officers should be held accountable for misconduct even if they were “unaware at the time that their actions were illegal.”

Democrats and Independents Support Ending Qualified Immunity, Republicans Want to Keep It
Majorities Oppose Allowing Police to Use Ignorance of the Law as Reason to Avoid Lawsuits

Ferguson Effect?

Although Americans support ending or reforming qualified immunity for police officers, the public is also worried that intense criticism of the police could drive up crime rates. This is the idea behind the “Ferguson effect,” the theory that distrust of the police makes it difficult for the police to do their jobs, allowing crime to increase.

Fifty‐​five percent (55%) believe ending qualified immunity for police would mean that police “may be too afraid to do their jobs effectively because they will fear being sued or harassed.” Similarly, 55% of Americans are worried that more intense criticism of police could disincentivize them from doing their jobs and crime could go up.

Police Unions

Americans are divided but lean in favor of continuing the practice required in many police union contracts of having an arbitrator review firings of police officers. Fifty‐​two percent (52%) favor allowing arbitrators review and sometimes overturn the firings of police officers for misconduct. Nearly as many (48%) oppose. A majority of Republicans (74%) support this practice as do a slim majority of independents (51%). But a strong majority of Democrats (64%) disagree.

The public supports other police union reforms. For instance, many police union contracts require that police officers’ records of misconduct be erased every few years. However, 84% of Americans oppose this practice, including 58% who strongly oppose. Opposition is non‐​partisan with 89% of Democrats, 85% of independents, and 76% of Republicans who oppose.

Nearly two‐​thirds, 62%, of Americans say police unions should not be allowed to collectively bargain with government officials “over the methods used to hold police officers accountable for misconduct.” Strong majorities of Democrats (71%) and independents (65%) oppose collective bargaining for this purpose. But Republicans stand out. A slim majority (52%) think police unions should get to collectively bargain over disciplinary methods, while nearly as many (48%) oppose.

Republicans Lean in Favor of Allowing Police Unions to Collectively Bargain over Disciplinary Methods

Defunding the Police

The survey found 57% of Americans oppose “defunding police departments” while 43% favor defunding them. There are stark partisan divisions: 66% of Democrats favor defunding the police, while majorities of independents (62%) and Republicans (85%) oppose.

Majority of Democrats Favor Defunding Police Departments

These results indicate a notable shift among Democrats from a month ago when an Economist/​YouGov poll found that 34% of Democrats favored “cutting funding for police departments.”1 Twenty percent (20%) of independents and 11% of Republicans agreed.

There is a racial divide as well: a majority (62%) of white Americans and slim majority (51%) of Latino Americans oppose defunding police departments while a majority (61%) of Black Americans support it.

The phrase “defund police” has come to mean different things to different people, besides withdrawing all funds from police departments. For instance, the Economist/​YouGov poll found that only 19% of Democrats favor “abolishing the police,” as did 8% of independents and 5% of Republicans. Similarly, smaller shares of White Americans (8%), Black Americans (22%), and Hispanic Americans (20%) support abolishing police. This indicates that for a considerable number of people defunding the police is about reducing their funding, or redesigning their structure, rather than disbanding police altogether.

Experience with the Police

About 1 in 10 Americans (12%) say they personally have been physically mistreated or abused by a police officer, a quarter say they know someone who has. There is a stark racial divide in reported experiences with the police. Black (19%) and Hispanic Americans (17%) are more than twice as likely as White Americans (8%) to say they personally have been physically abused by police. When taking into account social networks, 44% of Black Americans and 38% of Hispanic Americans say they or someone they know has been abused by police, compared to 28% of White Americans.

Black and Hispanic Americans Are More Likely to Report Experience with Police Mistreatment

Perceptions of Excessive Force

The survey found that Americans believe that about 25% of police officers regularly use excessive force when carrying out their duties. Perceptions vary widely across partisan and racial/​ethnic groups. White Americans think about 20% of police on average use too much force, while Black Americans think about 50% of police use excessive force. Latino Americans think the share is 45% of police. Republicans think far fewer police officers engage in routine misconduct, estimating that about 10% do. In contrast, Democrats (40%) and independents (30%) estimate significantly more police routinely use excessive force.

Americans Have Different Perceptions of How Many Police Officers Use Excessive Force

The survey also asked the public about their perceptions about what they believed was the primary reason the police arrest disproportionately more African Americans: 40% said racial bias in either policing (30%) or the laws that police enforce (10%), 38% said different crime rates among different racial groups, 13% said different poverty levels among different groups, and 9% said some other reason.

There are significant age differences in perceptions. A majority (52%) of Americans under 35 say racial bias is the primary cause of disparate arrest rates, while 26% say different crime rates, and 13% say different poverty levels. About half (49%) of Americans over 55 believe different crime rates are the primary cause, 31% say racial bias, and 11% say different poverty levels. Democrats view racial bias as the primary cause (64%), while 19% say different crime rates and 12% say different poverty levels. Republicans see things differently: 66% say different crime rates, 12% say racial bias, 10% say different poverty levels are the primary reason. There is a racial divide in perceptions as well. Among White Americans: 32% say systemic racism is the primary cause, 45% say different crime rates, 12% say different poverty levels. Black Americans have a different view: 77% say it’s due to racial bias in policing and the legal system, 9% say different crime rates among different racial groups, 9% say different poverty levels. Latinos are in between with 43% who say racism, 33% say different crime rates, and 17% say different poverty levels are the primary cause.

David Kemp contributed to this report.

Methodology

The survey toplines and methodology can be found here. Crosstabs of results can be found here.

The Cato Institute Summer 2020 National Survey was designed and conducted by the Cato Institute in collaboration with YouGov. YouGov collected responses online during July 1–6, 2020 from a national sample of 2,000 Americans 18 years of age and older. Restrictions are put in place to ensure that only the people selected and contacted by YouGov are allowed to participate. The margin of error for the survey is +/- 2.36 percentage points at the 95% level of confidence.

Emily Ekins

Emily Ekins is a research fellow and director of polling at the Cato Institute. Her research focuses on public opinion, American politics, political psychology, and social movements.

Notes