The Selectivity of American “Countering Violent Extremism” Policies

This week, the Obama administration and Congress continued their public duel over whether the U.S. government is doing enough to “counter violent extremism” (CVE). The White House press release on the “Leader’s Summit to Counter ISIL and Violent Extremism” lauded the administration’s efforts to prevent the radicalization of Muslim‐​American youth at the hands of ISIS. A 66‐​page report released by the House Homeland Security Committee (HSC) condemned the administration’s actions as inadequate on multiple levels. Both documents avoided a re‐​airing of unpleasant truths about why ISIS has managed to grow regionally and even find a tiny number of would‐​be fellow travelers here.


The first unpleasant truth is that by invading Iraq in 2003, the United States helped to give new life to Salafist‐​oriented groups like al Qaeda. Indeed, there was no AQ element in Iraq until after the U.S. invasion. The same was true in Libya until the ill‐​fated U.S.-sponsored toppling of the Qaddafi regime in 2011. Neither the administration’s press release nor the HSC report acknowledged those facts.


Mindless American interventionism has been one of the greatest recruiting tools for Salafist groups like ISIS.


Indeed, every Western hostage killed by ISIS was wearing an orange‐​colored prison jump suit‐​like garment, just like the ones worn by Iraqi prisoners tortured by U.S. forces at Abu Ghraib prison or those held still at Guantanamo. Neither President Obama nor the authors of the HSC report can bring themselves to admit that our own actions in the Middle East and Southwest Asia have helped to fuel the very terrorist violence and domestic recruiting efforts both decried this week.


The second unpleasant truth dodged by the White House and the HSC is that all the mass surveillance programs initiated in the post‐​9/​11 era have failed to detect a string of real plots or actual attacks in advance. Yet the HSC report calls for a doubling‐​down on federal support for state‐​level intelligence “fusion centers,” none of which have uncovered actual terrorist plots while targeting civil liberties groups that question their utility and the constitutionality of their operational methods. 



A third unpleasant truth avoided by the HSC and the Obama administration is that CVE is not an “equal opportunity” program aimed at all kinds of violent extremists. The federal CVE focus is squarely on Arab‐ and Muslim‐​Americans, even though right‐​wing American political extremists have killed almost twice as many U.S. persons in the post‐​9/​11 era as have American Salafist‐​oriented terrorists.


The taxpayer‐​funded CVE program is little more than a rhetorically dressed up race‐​and‐​religion‐​profiling counterterrorism campaign. That it is failing should surprise none of us.