The politics of free speech are changing fast.


The presidential public financing system is all but dead, largely because the candidates are raising so much money they don’t need to dun the taxpayers for campaign cash. The Democrats have raised a lot more money for the coming election than the Republicans. The Supreme Court is starting to favor free speech in campaign finance cases and casting a cold eye on laws like McCain‐​Feingold.


For most of the past three decades, so‐​called “reform” groups have dominated DC battles about campaign finance. These special interest groups lobbied Congress while their lawyers practiced the art of restricting speech before the Federal Election Commission.


Now that too is changing. A new group, Speech​Now​.org, has formed to fight restrictions on speech. They just asked the Federal Election Commission to issue an advisory opinion about whether their fundraising must follow the contribution limits in federal election law.


Contribution limits exist–in law, if not in fact–to prevent corruption or the appearance of corruption. But Speech​Now​.org is not giving money to federal candidates for office, and it is not incorporated (corporations cannot legally give money to parties or candidates). The organization is funded solely by individuals, some of whom want to give more than $5,000 to support the work of the new group.


What are they planning to do? The Center for Competitive Politics, which along with the Institute for Justice provides legal counsel to Speech​Now​.org, says that “the group wants to run TV ads supporting and opposing candidates on free speech issues during the 2008 election cycle.”


Think about that for a minute. A group of citizens wants to come together to pool their resources to speak out for and against candidates on matters concerning free speech. They don’t plan to give candidates or the parties money, so the corruption threat does not exist. What could be more in line with the First Amendment and the Constitution? And yet… Speech​Now​.org finds itself asking the Federal Election Commission “mother may I?” just to exercise its constitutional rights.


That should make you angry.


But think about this too. Speech​Now​.org is something different from what we’ve heard on these issues for so many years, a group that plans to defend the First Amendment outside the courtroom. And somewhere in this nation is at least one person who is willing to give Speech​Now​.org more than $5,000 for that effort.


That gives me hope.