Today POLITICO Arena asks:
Will President Obama's campaign finance attacks on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and others resonate with voters over the next three weeks?
With so many senior advisors leaving the White House so early in the term, you have to wonder who's left to advise the president except, well -- the president. And judging from his attacks on corporate campaign spending generally and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in particular, you're inclined to believe that that's the case. After all, the attacks are perfectly consistent with the president's larger agenda.
As others here at the Arena have noted, not since the New Deal have we seen so sustained an anti-business political agenda as has come from this president. Under such an assault, is it any wonder that businesses have created so few jobs, or that they're fighting back? Yet for that, the president is criticizing them -- with campaign finance claims that not even the New York Times finds credible.
This campaign finance angle has an especially unseemly air about it, however -- see the Wall Street Journal's editorial this morning about Democrats unleashing the IRS and Justice on donors to their political opponents. The effort to restrict the speech that campaign finance represents -- promoted by the political establishment, especially Democrats -- has always been at bottom about incumbency protection, not "good government." We didn't hear complaints when Obama abandoned the public financing system in 2008, for example, as "unconscionable" amounts of private money poured into his campaign. Obama may be barking now that the shoe's on the other foot, but his bark rings as hollow as his agenda, which is why it's not resonating with the voters, and is not likely to in the three weeks ahead.