My friend and Cato media fellow Radley Balko is currently participating in an online debate on the Economist website, the motion being that "This house believes there should be no legal restrictions on gambling." Radley is, of course, defending the motion. The first round of arguments is up and voting (and commenting) is open.
Radley was leading by a landslide this morning, but there has been a curious development. Reports Radley:
Interesting. Support from my side went from 85% to 46% in a little over three hours, during which no new arguments were posted. Wondering if a Baptist convention just let out.
The debaters will close their arguments on Wednesday, with the winner announced Friday. Please show your support for civil liberties and for Radley by voting.
Also, the Economist had a terrific special report on gambling last week. Their leader article made a good case for legalizing online gambling in America, but curiously (for a newspaper proudly associated with the free trade cause) did not mention the compelling trade-related reasons to allow Americans to gamble freely online.