“We’re Going to Have to Come Up with Something.”

And that something is a national ID.


The quote is Senator Chuck Schumer’s (D‑NY), speaking about immigration reform at Politico’s Playbook Breakfast. The national ID gloss is mine, based on the immutable logic of “internal enforcement.”


Senators Schumer and McCain (R‑AZ) say that the “Gang of Eight” senators who are working up an immigration reform package are united on the idea of making it impossible for illegal immigrants to get work in the United States. The only way to do that is to put all working Americans — if you work, that means you — into a national ID system.


“People say, ‘National ID card,’ ” Senator Schumer says. They do because that is what he’s talking about.


Now, they haven’t gotten all the way through the logic of their plans. Senator Schumer talks about a “non‐​forgeable [Social Security] card,” but a Social Security card only proves that a certain name is linked to a certain number. If a system is going to prove that a given person is entitled to work in the United States, it must be an identity system. It must compare the identifiers of the person to the identifiers in the system, whether held on a card or in a database, so that it can assess their legal status, including natural‐​born citizenship.


This is why Senator Schumer also talks about biometrics. The system must biometrically identity everyone who works — you, me, and every working American you know. There is no way to do internal enforcement of immigration law without a biometric national identity system.


It looks as though E‑Verify, an incipient national ID system, will be a part of most or all comprehensive immigration reform proposals. Ironically, immigration reform that aligns the law with our country’s economic need for labor would obviate the need for E‑Verify and a national ID. 


There are lots of ways to become familiar with the national ID issues that have yet to bubble up in this early stage of the immigration reform debate. My 2006 book, Identity Crisis, is a decent primer on identity and national ID generally. I examined the direct line between internal enforcement of immigration law and a national ID in my 2008 paper: “Electronic Employment Eligibility Verification: Franz Kafka’s Solution to Illegal Immigration.” And my article in last year’s special Cato Journal on immigration reform was called: “Internal Enforcement, E‑Verify, and the Road to a National ID.”