We should not be asking sacrifices from middle‐class folks who are working hard every day, from the most vulnerable in our society — we should not be asking them to make sacrifices if we’re not asking the most fortunate in our society to make some sacrifices as well.
I call that a fundamentally flawed argument:
The main thing our government does these days, despite the lack of any constitutional authority for it, is tax some people and transfer money to other people. …But there is no moral equivalence in the two sides of the transfer system. On the one hand, the government takes money by force from people who have earned it. On the other hand, it gives some of that money to people who have not earned it. Taking yet more money that people have earned is simply not equivalent to reducing the size of a government transfer.
There is, however, one way that we could ask businesses and the rich to join in the deficit‐reduction effort:
But here’s a way to satisfy both those who see spending as the problem and those who want the highest‐taxed Americans to pay yet more: Start cutting subsidies to businesses and the rich. Let’s cut out the big‐business subsidy machine, the Export‐Import Bank. Let’s get rid of farm subsidies. Let’s tell affluent people who build houses in coastal flood areas to pay for their own flood insurance at market prices.