Arnold Kling offers a strange remark about last night's presidential debate:
If the candidates were out to correct economic ignorance instead of pandering to it, the debate would not resemble last night's in any way.
If the two candidates had corrected economic ignorance throughout their careers instead of pandering to it, they would not be the two major candidates for the presidency. Two other politicians who affirmed economic ignorance and pandered to it would have participated in last night's debate.
You could say that both Obama and McCain have let their ambition get the better of them, but they are politicians and that is like saying, as many now are, that investors should not seek profits. Both candidates believe spouting economic ignorance provides an apt means to winning the presidency.
Question for the class: what does all this tell us about American democracy?