Webster’s defines “idiosyncrasy” as “a peculiarity of constitution or temperament” or “characteristic peculiarity (as of temperament); broadly: eccentricity.”
And what does the New York Times define as an idiosyncrasy? A headline this weekend tells us that
Idiosyncrasy Runs Deep in the Soil of Wyoming
And what’s this idiosyncrasy? Cowboy poetry? Jackalopes? Being the first state to grant women the vote?
No, here’s what the Times finds idiosyncratic:
Wyoming’s way — always idiosyncratic in the windblown, rural grain that mixes mind‐your‐own‐business cowboy libertarianism and fiscal penny‐pinching — is getting its moment in the spotlight.
Yep, what the New York Times finds idiosyncratic in a nation formed to guarantee the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness is a libertarian spirit combined with fiscal conservatism.
It’s not clear that Wyoming lives up to this picture: The Cato Institute’s Fiscal Policy Report Card on America’s Governors noted in 2006 that Wyoming’s budget had risen 60 percent in less than four years. And the Mercatus Center report “Freedom in the 50 States” put Wyoming barely above the national median for both personal and economic freedom. But the libertarian instincts are there, as Jason Sorens and I found in calculations of voter attitudes in the states.
So let’s hear it for “mind‐your‐own‐business cowboy libertarianism and fiscal penny‐pinching” — may it spread beyond the four corners of idiosyncratic Wyoming.