Cato’s Isabel Santa uses school choice as an example of why competition is better than government‐imposed monopolies. The video explains that government schools cost more and deliver less, which is exactly what one might expect when there is an inefficient monopoly structure. The evidence about the school‐choice systems in Sweden, Chile, and the Netherlands is particularly impressive.
There are many other reasons to support school choice, including diversity and innovation. There also is no need for fights over school prayer and sex education when parents can choose schools that reflect their values.
Perhaps most important, school choice should be the civil rights issue of the 21st century. Many minority families live in areas where the government school monopoly does a scandalously poor job of educating children, even though these often are the school districts with higher‐than‐average per‐pupil spending.
For more information about education issues, see what Cato’s scholars have written.