Politicians from Europe’s high‐tax governments recognize that saving and investment are escaping to jurisdictions with less‐punitive tax regimes. But rather than lower their oppressive tax rates, they are trying to gain the ability to track – and tax – flight capital.
A couple of years ago, they implemented the so‐called savings tax directive, but this system is ineffective (from the perspective of politicians) since many financial centers are not part of the cartel and many types of investment vehicles are not covered. Not surprisingly, politicians from nations such as France and Germany want to expand the tax cartel to cover more nations and to capture more forms of saving and investment.
Fortunately, as Tax-news.com reports, the Asian financial centers are not favorably disposed to serving as tax collectors for Europe’s inefficient welfare states. As such, high‐tax nations may feel compelled to reduce tax rates to keep capital from fleeing:
Senior EU tax officials, including European Tax Commissioner Laszlo Kovacs, are preparing to make a fresh approach to Asian financial centres, in a bid to have them included within the ambit of the European Savings Tax Directive. According to a report from Reuters, Kovacs is scheduled to visit Hong Kong later this month, while other senior officials will launch a new charm offensive in the territory of Macau and the city‐state of Singapore. The directive, which extends to a number of ‘third countries’ such as Switzerland, the Channel Islands and Caribbean offshore territories, facilitates the exchange of information between EU tax authorities on certain types of savings and investments held by EU residents in their territory, so that interest earned can be taxed in the resident investor’s home state. …
[W]hile the EU was effectively able to bully smaller territories such as those in the Caribbean with colonial links to member states like the UK and the Netherlands, the Asian territories have no such ties binding them to Europe. Unsurprisingly, EU officials have already received frosty responses from Hong Kong and Singapore regarding the issue, and little is expected to have changed. In the case of Hong Kong, signing up to the savings tax directive could mean altering the Basic Law which safeguards the future of its financial centre under Chinese rule.
Singapore on the other hand, is known to be staunchly opposed to the idea of sharing bank account information with the EU, and has rejected European overtures to include information exchange provisions within a broader economic agreement. The European Commission is currently reviewing the operation of the savings tax directive and is likely to make several recommendations for tightening up the legislation that would make it harder for EU‐based investors to legitimately side‐step the law — for example by moving assets from bank accounts to vehicles such as companies and trusts — which weren’t included in the legislation — or by shifting money to accounts based in territories out of the reach of the directive’s information sharing provisions.