My column at the Washington Examiner (and Reason.com) this week uses the collapse of the Dominique Strauss‐Kahn case to argue against the “perp walk,” which has become a form of pretrial punishment and a way for spotlight‐hungry prosecutors to grab attention — whether the ‘perp’ turns out to be guilty or not:
Back in May, when New York law enforcement paraded DSK before the cameras, hands cuffed behind his back, the French were outraged. “Incredibly brutal, violent and cruel,” France’s former justice minister gasped.
Irritating as it might be to admit it, the French have a point. The “perp walk” — in which suspects are ritually displayed to the media, trussed up like a hunter’s kill — has become common practice among prosecutors. But it’s a practice any country devoted to the rule of law should reject.
Of course, DSK isn’t the most sympathetic victim of the perp walk ever, nor, given paramilitary policing and “no knock” raids, is the perp walk the most abusive police/prosecutorial practice out there. But it’s at best a pointless indignity, and at worst a threat to due process — which is why it should be reined in. For Cato work on police tactics and misconduct, go here; and also see Reason’s recent “criminal justice” issue.