The Supreme Court decided Citizens United two years ago this week. The complaints about the ruling that have emerged since are often bizarre and misrepresent much of the landmark ruling's import. Here's what the case was about.
Almost nowhere in the complaints about the Citizens United ruling will you hear that the case decided that certain books or Pay-per-View broadcasts could no longer be banned by the Federal Election Commission.
Former FEC commissioner Bradley A. Smith further detailed the breathtaking arguments made by the government during the initial oral argument.
(And here's more from attorney James Bopp, Jr. on the ultimate ruling.)
Since Citizens United, complaints from Common Cause and occupiers of various parks across the United States tend to focus on corporate personhood, the scourge of SuperPACs and at least one group's troubling idea to amend the Constitution so that---once and for all---"campaign spending is not a form of speech protected under the First Amendment."