Supply‐Side Tax Cuts and the Truth about the Reagan Economic Record
Bob Dole’s proposal for a 15 percent income tax cut has reignited the long‐standing debate about the economic impact of Reaganomics in the 1980s. This study assesses the Reagan supply‐side policies by comparing the nation’s economic performance in the Reagan years (1981–89) with its performance in the immediately preceding Ford‐Carter years (1974–81) and in the Bush‐Clinton years that followed (1989–95).
On 8 of the 10 key economic variables examined, the American economy performed better during the Reagan years than during the pre‐ and post‐Reagan years.
- Real economic growth averaged 3.2 percent during the Reagan years versus 2.8 percent during the Ford‐Carter years and 2.1 percent during the Bush‐Clinton years.
- Real median family income grew by $4,000 during the Reagan period after experiencing no growth in the pre‐Reagan years; it experienced a loss of almost $1,500 in the post‐Reagan years.
- Interest rates, inflation, and unemployment fell faster under Reagan than they did immediately before or after his presidency.
- The only economic variable that was worse in the Reagan period than in both the pre‐ and post‐Reagan years was the savings rate, which fell rapidly in the 1980s. The productivity rate was higher in the pre‐Reagan years but much lower in the post‐Reagan years.
This study also exposes 12 fables of Reaganomics, such as that the rich got richer and the poor got poorer, the Reagan tax cuts caused the deficit to explode, and Bill Clinton’s economic record has been better than Reagan’s.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.