Maryland v. King and Government Abuse of DNA Tests

June 10, 2013

The recent Maryland v. King decision revealed Antonin Scalia to be less of the opponent of individual liberties than his detractors would claim. In his dissent, he made clear that many supporters of broad DNA testing would like to use it to identify people not currently suspected of any wrongdoing. Cato Senior Fellow Walter Olson comments.

Video produced by Caleb O. Brown and Austin Bragg.


Subscribe to Cato Video:

Subscribe on iTunes Subscribe via RSS

Recent Cato Videos