As Politico reported this week, McConnell is pursuing a “pure extension” of the law. He is doing so despite the findings of a presidential review group 18 months ago that one expiring provision, the act’s Sec. 215 metadata program, was useless: “Our review suggests that the information contributed to terrorist investigations by the use of … telephony metadata was not essential to preventing attacks and could readily have been obtained in a timely manner using conventional [court] orders.”
And storing all of that useless information — the overwhelming majority of it the communications of innocent Americans, collected in violation of the Constitution according to one federal district judge — has required the NSA to build one of the biggest data centers on the planet, at a cost of $1.7 billion, to hold it all.
Supporters of the surveillance status quo are clearly not concerned that this and similar programs also deemed worthless are budget‐busting forms of “digital security theater.” They have, however, resorted to a shopworn but still popular tactic: fear‐mongering mixed with historical revisionism.
McConnell’s key ally, Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R., NC), told Politico that proposed reforms to NSA’s surveillance powers would make it so the intelligence community couldn’t “connect dots.” Of course, that formulation is a familiar one, appearing first in a 2002 USA Today storyon the emerging findings of the Congressional Joint Inquiry into the 9/11 attacks, which would go on to conclude that managerial and analytical failures, not a lack of information, is what hampered our ability to foil the 9/11 attacks.
That finding would be echoed and amplified by the 9/11 Commission two years later. And as the New York Times reported last month, a 750‐page intelligence‐community report prepared by multiple inspectors general in 2009 found that warrantless surveillance carried out under the STELLAR WIND program — an illegal companion program to the officially sanctioned PATRIOT Act programs — was also virtually useless in countering national‐security threats.
What we also know about these surveillance programs — beyond Edward Snowden’s revelations — is that they failed to stop the “shoe bomber,” the “underwear bomber,” the Ft. Hood shooter, the Boston Marathon bombers, and, most recently, the Garland, Texas, shooters.
Federal mass‐surveillance programs represent just the latest in a long and dishonorable line of costly government boondoggles. But even worse, this one robs us of our constitutional rights. Is it any wonder Congress’s approval ratings are at historic lows?