I blogged about the arrogance of some members of Congress during last week's farm debate in the House.
From the Congressional Record, check out this bluster from farm committee member Tim Walz (D-MN) during the floor debate. (Note that he is objecting to reforms proposed by Reps. Ron Kind (D-WI) and Jeff Flake (R-AZ):
I rise in opposition to my good friend from Wisconsin's piece of legislation. It's well meaning, but I believe it does not address the needs of my district. The people of the First District of Minnesota, I think, can probably lay claim to one of the richest agricultural pieces of land in the entire world . . . I had 14 hearings throughout my district with universal acceptance of making sure the safety net is maintained . . . When I need advice on the farm bill, I go to a couple of good farmers in my district, Kevin Papp, president of the Minnesota Farm Bureau, and Doug Peterson, president of Minnesota's Farmers Union. I don't need to go to the ideologues at the Cato Institute or Club for Growth to know what's good for rural America.
Have you got it? If you are a taxpayer footing the bill for $30 billion or so of farm subsidies each year, then tough beans--just sit down and let Mr. Walz spend your money on his special interest friends.
A few questions to ponder:
Do you think that there was "universal acceptance" of big farm subsidies at his meetings because they were meetings of farmers?
If Mr. Walz's district is "one of the richest agricultural pieces of land in the entire world" then why the heck does it need subsidies?