Welfare for the Wealthy (an Ongoing Series)
An earlier post noted the hot political trend of convincing the upper middle class and the wealthy that they are financially vulnerable and in need of government assistance.
From loan subsidies for McMansions to blue‐blood public works, from the doling out of market power and financial support to businessmen, to the offering of government money and tax breaks to (usually well‐to‐do) people who consume in a government‐approved manner, politicians of Red stripes and Blue are all about helping the down‐and‐out in the (gated) community.
Such welfare‐for‐the‐wealthy is the subtext of Sunday’s NYT story about the Children’s Health Insurance Program. CHIP was once intended to help children in families that are low‐income but that do not qualify for Medicaid; now Congress is pushing for the state‐operated/federally supported program to use its money to cover families up to four times the poverty level (e.g., a family of four earning $82,600 a year) — that is, nearly all families in the second‐highest income quintile, aka the upper middle class.
The NYT article includes a provocative figure about the effects of CHIP. When the program was first implemented, the percentage of families with income between the poverty level and 200% of the poverty level (i.e., the families whom the program was intended to help) with uninsured children began to decline, falling from 20% in 1998 to about 12% by 2002. However, the percentage of those lower‐income families with privately insured children also began to fall over that time, from about 55% to about 45%. Since 2002, the percentage of uninsured children in that income range has roughly plateaued while the percentage of children with private insurance has continued to fall, to about 35 percent by 2006. This suggests (though, by itself, does not prove) that, by 2002, CHIP had gone about as far as it could go in reducing the percentage of uninsured children in poor families; since then, CHIP has simply displaced private insurance — a dubious policy goal.
Given that, it’s no wonder politicians want to mission‐creep CHIP into wealthier income brackets. But one must wonder what the next welfare‐for‐the‐wealthy program will be. Perhaps a chicken in every pot and a Lexus in every garage?
