This morning I attended a federal student aid event at the New America Foundation. The big topic? Not the effect of aid on out‐​of‐​control college prices, by far the most important concern from the contexts of economic growth, affordability, fairness to taxpayers, etc. No, it was the Obama Administration’s “bold” (NAF’s word) proposal to kill the federal guaranteed student loan program and do all lending directly from Washington. It was just the kind of debate folks in DC love, one that sounds really important but leaves the government‐​created problem almost totally untouched.


Here’s the critical reality that was completely ignored: taxpayer‐​furnished financial aid – whether coming directly from DC or delivered by “private” institutions completely backed by DC – appears to be a very big enabler of rampant tuition inflation. Quite simply, as I lay out in the most recent Cato Handbook for Policy, when government ensures that customers can pay more, students demand more and colleges raise prices.


Of course, the argument that aid drives prices is not without its critics, but they’ve got a tough case to make both in terms of economic theory and college cost reality. In Washington, however, this isn’t even being discussed. In DC, it’s all about the deck chairs and nothing about the sinking ship. But then, as we’ve learned oh‐​so‐​clearly over the last several months, politicians gain little from averting disasters they’ve helped cause, and lots from handing out life jackets.


Fortunately, Cato is here to remind politicians about the important stuff, not just to bicker over which special interest gets the biggest tax‐​dollar windfall. On April 7 we will address the fundamental problems with student aid, hosting a Capitol Hill Briefing on the effects not just of switching from guaranteed lending to direct lending, but of all federal student aid. It’ll be just the kind of discussion Washington so desperately needs but so rarely has.


Register here to attend, or watch online the day of the event.