I’m currently attending Cato University — extraordinary academics, so‐so athletics — so I’ve neither been able to get to the edublogs in too timely a fashion, nor ruminate extensively on their content. I have, though, managed to get to a few blogs, and couldn’t help but notice a question‐and‐answer in need of facilitation.
Over at Flypaper — the blog of the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation — Mike Petrilli has returned from vacation and not missed a beat in his national‐education‐standards march. Picking up on a recent Jonathan Alter column dealing largely with crippling teacher‐union obstructionism, Petrilli declares that:
if we harnessed the resources we currently spend on our fifty‐state system of tests for one common system, we could afford to measure subjects beyond reading and math, online, in a way that encouraged intellectually‐challenging schoolwork rather than test prep.
My concern here is not with the money‐saving proposition. It’s with the “intellectually‐challenging schoolwork” assumption. It goes back to an argument I’ve made many times before, but this time another blogger has brought it up, and one quite different than libertarian ol’ me. Asks Andy Rotherham over at Eduwonk, contemplating the gaming of state tests under No Child Left Behind:
Can someone explain exactly how a national, federal, or “American” in the new parlance, test will be any different? If indeed there is a political pathology out there to make schools look better, regardless of whether they are better, a proposition that seems pretty spot on to me, then how are the politics somehow so radically different at the national level? National test proponents have never really answered this question except to point to the NAEP. But, the NAEP is a no‐stakes test right now so it really doesn’t make the point.
Terrific questions, Andy, to which I’d just add: How especially would you expect high‐stakes national tests to escape gaming pressures when the National Education Association, American Federation of Teachers, American Association of School Administrators, National School Boards Association, and just about every other major education interest group has its headquarters right in the DC area?
I — and I assume Andy — would love to hear the answers to these questions.