As I should have mentioned in my previous post, the House and Senate are likely to vote on the Farm Bill conference report tomorrow.
The bill, an abysmal one that carries a price tag of roughly $300 billion, will likely pass easily in the Senate, where an earlier version of the bill sailed through the chamber last year in a 79–14 vote.
So the questions over the possibility of an override center mainly on the House, which will likely see a closer vote, but not by much.
If House Republicans are unable to secure enough votes to sustain a veto, it would signify a remarkable failure of their leadership, especially of House Minority Leader John Boehner. Boehner has publically opposed the bill, but — along with House Minority Whip Roy Blunt — has refused to actively push his Republican colleagues to do the same.
An article in today’s The Hill notes:
[L]obbyists said members were being told to “vote their districts,” meaning they could support the measure without fearing any consequence from leadership.
What’s worse is that the bill probably could have been improved upon, much earlier in the process. The Republican leadership has full discretion over committee assignments. Instead of seating on the Agriculture Committee a balanced array of viewpoints, the House GOP leadership has chosen a collection of members that hail almost universally from farm‐heavy districts and are greatly predisposed to support an increase in agricultural spending.
In fact, an informal vote count compiled by the office of Rep. Jeff Flake suggests that every single Republican member of the House Agriculture Committee is likely to support the Farm Bill tomorrow.
What would the bill look like if Rep. Flake or another critic of current farm policies was a member of the committee? Sure, one member can have only so much impact on a committee of 46. But at least that would give taxpayers a voice at the table.