Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist recently launched a health policy blog. The latest post (by "Sailor") complains that people are focusing on Medicare Part D's donut hole rather than the tasty donut itself:
The most amazing criticism is that there is a donut hole. It is amazing that those who argue this is a defect in part D fail to understand there used to never be any donut at all -- and they just continue to focus on the hole rather than the enormous benefit (donut) that never previously existed for seniors.
I'm not sure that criticism of the 'donut hole' is all that amazing. As Cato adjunct scholar David Hyman explains in an upcoming book (Medicare Meets Mephistopheles), Democrats have made their careers by using Medicare to pass out donuts. What did Frist, Inc., expect Democrats would do once Republicans got in on the donut racket? Quit? Or up the ante?
Is this why Dr. Frist got into politics? To hand out donuts?