Don’t Count on China

Following on from the visit last month of United States Trade Representative Susan Schwab, the Director‐​General of the World Trade Organization, Pascal Lamy, is visiting China this week to drum up Chinese support for reviving the Doha round of multilateral trade negotiations. He appears to have been given the same non‐​response as the USTR.


The Chinese have put the ball squarely back in the court of the EU and the United States, saying it was up to the major developed countries to take the lead in reviving the talks. (full story here).


China has so far kept very quiet in the trade talks, limiting their participation to argue for a ‘time out’ from trade liberalization for newly‐​acceded members. Having given major “concessions” to join the club, they figure they’ve paid their dues and should be given time to soak up the atmosphere. And given the often poisonous rhetoric surrounding China’s role in the world economy (not least from certain U.S. Congressmen), one can hardly blame them from keeping their heads below the parapet in the negotiations proper.


It is true, as Ambassador Schwab and DG Lamy have argued, that China has gained a lot from joining the WTO (although many of those gains would have been realized anyway as a result of unilaterally liberalizing their economy) and would stand to lose from a failed WTO. Similarly, China should be held to account for the commitments it made upon joining the WTO. But expecting China to take a more active role in the negotiations, and reverse their stance of the past five or so years, is a bit much. And, as they have proved on the currency issue, the Chinese won’t be bullied.


The “quiet diplomacy” to revive the round will likely continue, including at the IMF and World Bank shindigs later this month. But if a miracle occurs and the Doha round is concluded, it won’t be because of China’s efforts.