Californians may be forgiven for expectorating coffee over their morning newspapers today, as they learn that their state deficit is not $9 billion, as Governor Brown’s administration had predicted, but rather $16 billion. Oops.
Further increasing the breakfast table choking hazard is the Governor’s “solution”: raise taxes. Gov. Brown is pushing a fall ballot initiative that would raise both sales and income taxes. He argues that this is preferable to cutting spending on things like public schooling on the grounds that schools have already been slashed to the bone. But have they? Actually, no. California’s per pupil spending has nearly doubled over the past forty odd years, in real inflation‐adjusted dollars, and remains near its all‐time high.
What did California get for that massive spending increase? Not a great deal if the SAT performance of its college‐bound high school students is any guide. And, as I pointed out in this op‐ed, it’s a pretty reasonable guide.
But while raising taxes has consistently failed to improve educational performance, cutting them actually works—via tax‐credit school choice programs that give families an easier choice between public and private schools. Florida’s education tax credit program, for instance, has been shown to improve the achievement of students who stay in public schools, to improve the achievement of students who accept scholarships and attend private schools, and to save taxpayers millions of dollars a year. If expanded on a mass scale in a large state like California, it would save billions of dollars a year.
So what’ll it be, Californians? Fiscal and education policy sobriety, or the Governor’s hair‐of‐the‐dog continued big government partying?