A $600‐​million bill to enhance border enforcement has hit a temporary snag in the Senate, but it is almost inevitable, with an election only a few months away, that Congress and the president will spend yet more money trying to enforce our unworkable immigration laws.


“Getting control of the border” is the buzz phrase of the day for politicians in both parties, from Sen. John McCain, R‐​Ariz., to Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. Never mind that apprehensions are down sharply along our Southwest border with Mexico, mostly I suspect because of the lack of robust job creation in the unstimulated Obama economy.


Meanwhile, since the early 1990s, spending on border enforcement has increased more than 700 percent, and the number of agents along the border has increased five‐​fold, from 3,500 to more than 17.000. (See pages 3–4 of a January 2010 report from the Center for American Progress and the Immigration Policy Center.) Yet the population of illegal immigrants in America tripled during that period. If this were a federal education program, conservatives would rightly accuse the big spenders of merely throwing more money at a problem without result.


To pay for this politically driven expenditure, Congress plans to nearly double fees charged for H1-B and L visas used by foreign high‐​tech firms to staff their operations in the United States. The increased visa tax will fall especially hard on companies such as the Indian high‐​tech leaders Wipro, Infosys, and Tata.


This all has the ring of election‐​year populism. Congress pretends to move us closer to solving the problem of illegal immigrants entering from Latin America by raising barriers to skilled professionals coming to the United States from India and elsewhere to help us maintain our edge in competitive global technology markets.