Administration Punts on Reform of Fannie and Freddie

Remember that “tough study” promised by Senator Chris Dodd to deal with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? Well it is finally out. All 22 pages (of doubled‐​spaced large font). And less than half those pages actually discuss Fannie and Freddie.


While the report does say a lot of the right things — such as protecting the taxpayer — it is awfully short on any real details. And in many areas, the report makes clear that the Obama administration intends to keep the taxpayer on the hook for future losses arising from Fannie and Freddie. For instance, after assuring us that the GSEs will have sufficient capital to meet their obligations, including debt, the report tells us that such capital will not come from investors, but from the taxpayer. One has to wonder whether this report was written for the benefit of the Chinese Central Bank (one of the largest GSE debtholders) or for the benefit of the U.S. taxpayer.


Equally vague is the discussion of “winding down” Fannie and Freddie. While that sounds great, how is this to be accomplished? And how long will it take? Again it seems that this “wind‐​down” will be financed by the taxpayer. It is suggested that the GSE guarantee fees will increase. Again, by how much and when?


Paragraph 2 of Section 1074 of the Dodd‐​Frank act, which required this study, also requires an “analysis” of various options and impacts. In all due respect to HUD and Treasury and their efforts, there is nothing in this report that remotely resembles an “analysis” — just vague generalities.


I appreciate the administration’s stated desire to move us closer to a private market solution, but we’ve heard these empty promises before. Remember that financial reform was going to end “too big to fail” and bailouts? Health care reform was going to “bend the cost curve”? It is past the time of fluff. We need actual details and an actual plan. 


For details of immediate action that can be taken, see my testimony from earlier this week.