Elected officials from city council members to President Bush are scrambling to get to the front of the term‐limit parade. As Mike Kelley of Colorado’s Independence Institute writes, “Term limitation could become in the 1990s what tax limitation was in the 1970s–a popular movement politicians abhor, but one to which they must respond.”(1)
The gulf between legislators and the American people has never been greater than on the issue of term limits. A Gallup survey found that 66 percent of U.S. House members oppose limiting the number of congressional terms, while opinion polls show two‐to‐one support among all demographic groups.(2) (See Table 1.) The idea is overwhelmingly popular with Americans regardless of party, ideology, or income. Blacks favor it even more than whites, women more than men. Martin Plissner, political director for CBS News, says he has “never seen an issue on which there was so little demographic variation.”(3)
Term limits were a part of the nation’s first governing document, the Articles of Confederation, and were left out of the Constitution largely because they were thought of as “entering too much into detail” for a short document. Nonetheless, self‐imposed limits on officeholders were long a part of America’s public‐service ethic; members of Congress returned to private life after a couple of terms. With the rise of the modern superstate, term limitation, once the accepted American tradition, has been replaced by congressional careerism. That is why the voluntary service limitations of the past must now be made part of the nation’s laws.
