Modern economic growth is mainly about brain power and sound policy.Investment capital and entrepreneurial talent will flow toward economieswith low taxes, secure property rights, sound money and sensible regulatorypolicies. In contrast, when these factors are absent, people will find moreattractive environments elsewhere.
Nations prosper when they provide a climate that encourages their citizens,often in cooperation with foreigners, to discover and adopt better ways ofdoing things.
The recently released “2001 Economic Freedom of the World” annual report,published by a worldwide network of more than 50 institutes, examines thedegree to which a country’s institutions and policies adhere to principlesof economic freedom. The report uses data on the size of government, pricestability, trade openness, the quality of legal structures, and othervariables to develop a summary index of economic freedom. The index measuresthe ability of citizens in 123 countries to choose for themselves, engage inmarket activities, and keep what they earn.
This year’s report also grades 58 countries on a more comprehensive indexthat captures the effect of regulation and more accurately pinpoints thestrengths and weaknesses of each country. As was the case for the regularindex, Hong Kong and Singapore ranked first and second respectively. The twocity-state economieswere followed by the United States, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Ireland,Canada and Switzerland. Chile (tied with Germany for 16th) was the highestranked Latin American economy. The rankings of other large economiesincluded France (36th), India (46th), China (52nd) and Brazil (55th).
Western European countries generally ranked high in all areas except size ofgovernment and labor market regulation. Of the 58 countries graded, only twoWestern European countries (Ireland and Iceland) scored in the top 20 forsize of government. Belgium, France, Austria, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Italyand Spain all received low ratings in this area.
The situation was much the same for labor market regulation. France andGermany were the two lowest rated countries. All of the 10 countries withthe most restrictive labor regulations were Western European. The UnitedKingdom, Switzerland, Iceland and Ireland were the only Western Europeancountries ranking in the upper half of the 58 in this area.
A legal system that protects property rights and enforces contracts in an even-handed way is central to economic freedom and progress. So too is the freedom to compete in business. Almost all of the countries with the weakest legal systems and most highly regulated business sectors were either Latin American or former socialist countries. The 10 lowest rated countries in the legal area were Peru, Indonesia, Ecuador, Venezuela, Ukraine, Russia, Bolivia, Mexico, Colombia and El Salvador. The 10 with the most restrictive business regulations were Russia, Venezuela, Ukraine, Mexico, El Salvador, Bulgaria, Bolivia, Indonesia, Argentina and Colombia.
The point should not be missed: Inadequate legal systems and restrictiveregulations are stifling economic progress throughout much of Latin Americaand among the former socialist countries.
With regard to strengths and weaknesses, Mexico stands out. The good news isthat during the last two decades, Mexico moved from one of the least to oneof the most open economies in the world. In the trade openness area, Mexicoranks 17th , just below the U.K. and above France and the United States.Today, international trade is 64 percent of the Mexican economy, up from 23percent in 1985. The bad news is that Mexico still has a long way to gobefore it qualifies as a liberal economy. Its area rankings for quality oflegal system (52nd), access to sound money (49th), banking and finance(46th), and regulation of business (53rd) were all poor.
Prosperity depends on getting the institutional and policy environmentright. Nations that adopt policies inconsistent with economic freedom willstifle innovation and drive potential investors to more favorableenvironments. Their economies will stagnate and their citizens will continuein poverty.