The Supreme Court ruled today on Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton. This case is about whether states may require age verification for internet pornography websites.
Jennifer Huddleston, senior fellow in tech policy at the Cato Institute, issued the following statement in response to today’s ruling:
“Today’s decision affirmed the Fifth Circuit’s upholding of a Texas law that requires age verification around access to sexual content that is considered obscene to minors.
This decision should be considered in the context of the specific type of content, sexual content that is obscene to minors, while lower courts are still considering the issue of broader age verification laws for social media or other internet content. If expanded to broader areas of the internet like social media, this decision could significantly impact the extremely beneficial uses of this technology for free expression by both young people and adults.”
You can view Huddleston’s past work on the topic below:
- Jennifer Huddleston discusses age verification mandates and the SCOTUS on the Free State Foundation’s TMT with Mike O’Rielly
- Jennifer Huddleston discusses the pros and cons to the age verification debate of The Federalist Society’s Fourth Branch podcast
- New Online Safety Proposals Create More Problems Than Solutions
- Would New Legislation Actually Make Kids Safer Online?
- Improving Youth Online Safety without Sacrificing Privacy and Speech
If you’d like to speak with Huddleston about the case, please reach out to mmiller@cato.org.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.