Recently, Meta launched and quickly took down an AI image generator that uses public profiles on Instagram to generate images. Following this reversal by Meta, David Inserra, a fellow for free expression and technology at the Cato Institute, released a statement:

“Meta recently launched and then quickly pulled an AI tool known as Muse Image over concerns regarding how the tool allowed users to modify images from any public Instagram account. While users could opt out, many users felt that they hadn’t consented to the use of their images, were frustrated that they would not be notified if their images were used by others, and worried about their images being abused to create unsafe or intimate images.

“To be clear, users can determine what platforms and tools they wish to use. And, understandably, many users do not want this sort of feature, and just turning it on for all public users resulted in significant backlash. But at the same time, many users are using AI to generate speech more effectively, inexpensively, and quickly. Whether it be satire and political commentary, art and photography, or advertising and sales, AI tools are the modern-day printing press.

“Companies that make tools that are helpful and appeal to users can succeed— while, as this case shows, tools that are unwanted will not. Rather than use government force to make vast portions of AI speech illegal or subject to pressured takedowns, like the NO FAKES Act will do, we should continue to allow the market of AI tools to grow and develop while punishing those who break existing laws by abusing AI.”

To speak with Inserra, contact Christopher Tarvardian.