Should Investment Advisers Be Regulated, and If So, How?
Join the conversation on Twitter using #CatoEvents. Follow @CatoEvents on Twitter to get future event updates, live streams, and videos from the Cato Institute. If you have questions or need assistance registering for the event, please email our staff at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Whether investment advice should be regulated at the federal level has remained a contentious issue since at least the passage of the 1940 Investment Advisers Act, when Congress injected the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into what had previously been a common law driven regulatory regime. Dodd-Frank's Section 913 again inserts SEC into the process by requiring the SEC to study whether investment advisers and broker-dealers should be held to similar standards of conduct. Panelists will examine both the rationales for the current regulatory framework for investment advisers and whether that framework should be merged with the existing standards applied to broker-dealers.
This event is co-sponsored by the Institute for the Fiduciary Standard.
|10:30 - 11:45 a.m.|| Panel 1: The Regulation of Investment Advice
Director, Financial Regulation Studies, Cato Institute
Senior Research Fellow, Mercatus Center, George Mason University
Executive Director, Investment Adviser Association
Attorney, Institute for Justice
|12:00 - 1:15 p.m|| Panel 2: The Fiduciary Standard, for Advisers and Brokers?
Knut A. Rostad
President, Institute for the Fiduciary Standard
Former Chairman, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Policy Director, Americans for Financial Reform
Assistant Professor, Alfred State College, SUNY College of Technology