Should the Anti‐Ballistic Missile Treaty Be Scrapped?
Join the conversation on Twitter using #CatoEvents. Follow @CatoEvents on Twitter to get future event updates, live streams, and videos from the Cato Institute. If you have questions or need assistance registering for the event, please email our staff at firstname.lastname@example.org.
The 1972 anti‐ballistic missile treaty between the United States and the Soviet Union severely restricts the fielding of missile systems designed to defend the nation against an attack by nuclear‐armed, strategic ballistic missiles–that is, national missile defense systems. The Clinton administration has signed agreements that rejuvenate and expand the treaty. Proponents of the ABM treaty argue that it remains the cornerstone of nuclear stability. Opponents of the treaty argue that it is a relic of the Cold War, prevents the United States from adequately defending itself against a missile attack, and should be scrapped.