Meltdown: The Predictable Distortion of Global Warming by Scientists, Politicians, and the Media
(Cato Institute, 2004)
Join the conversation on Twitter using #CatoEvents. Follow @CatoEvents on Twitter to get future event updates, live streams, and videos from the Cato Institute. If you have questions or need assistance registering for the event, please email our staff at email@example.com.
Why is news about global warming always bad? Why do scientists offer such dire predictions about the future of the environment? Pat Michaels says it’s only natural, because of the way we do science today, where issues compete with each other for funding from a monopoly provider: the federal government. This leads to a culture of scientific exaggeration and a political community that takes credit from having saved us from certain doom—a doom played out nightly on the network news. Meltdown details hundreds of misstatements and exaggerations propagated by the professional community on the issue of climate change, including several scientific papers in major journals that were wrong at the time they were published, all consistent with the notion of what Michaels calls “predictable distortion.”