Build Up or Build Out? Solving the Housing Crisis
Due to technical difficulties, the broadcast was interrupted as the event was entering the question and answer portion of the presentation. With the event ending early, the panelists are now reviewing your submitted questions and will post the answers on the event page. If you registered for the event, we will notify you via email when the answers are available on the page.
Join the conversation on Twitter using #CatoEvents. Follow @CatoEvents on Twitter to get future event updates, live streams, and videos from the Cato Institute. If you have questions or need assistance registering for the event, please email our staff at events@cato.org.
Rising prices have created housing crises in many urban areas, particularly in the Northeast and on the West Coast. Experts agree that government regulations are the problem, but which regulations should be relaxed or repealed to make housing more affordable? Scott Beyer argues that restrictive zoning within cities is the problem and that such zoning should be lifted to allow developers to build up—that is, build more high‐density housing. Randal O’Toole argues that restrictive zoning in rural areas outside the cities is the problem and that such zoning should be abolished to allow developers to build out—that is, build more low‐density housing. Scott Lincicome argues that restrictive zoning in all areas should be relaxed, as should local, state, and federal regulations that needlessly inflate housing construction costs. Join us for a lively debate about property rights, housing demand, and housing supply.
Event Slideshows:
Event Resources:
