The 112th Congress and Military Spending
Join the conversation on Twitter using #CatoEvents. Follow @CatoEvents on Twitter to get future event updates, live streams, and videos from the Cato Institute. If you have questions or need assistance registering for the event, please email our staff at firstname.lastname@example.org.
The 112th Congress includes many new members elected on a promise to close the nation’s unsustainable deficits. Despite the efforts of some in Washington to exempt the Pentagon’s budget from scrutiny, the president’s deficit reduction commission and a nongovernmental panel chaired by former senator Pete Domenici (R-NM) and Alice Rivlin (former budget director for President Clinton) both called for cuts in military spending. Other proposals have called for even deeper reductions, noting that the defense budget has nearly doubled in real terms over the past 13 years. Even many conservatives now believe that the Pentagon’s budget can be cut without undermining American security. A letter circulated by Americans for Tax Reform, and signed by more than two dozen conservative leaders, declared that attempts to exempt military spending from cuts “would signal that the new Congress is not serious about fiscal responsibility and not ready to lead.” Will the 112th Congress lead on spending, and will they include the Pentagon’s budget in their plans? If so, in what ways will cuts in military spending force Washington to rein in its global ambitions? Please join us for a discussion of these issues.