Edited by Mark Moller
The latest edition of the Cato Supreme Court Review features articles on the New Deal Court by Richard Epstein, on the Court's mangled interpretation of the Takings Clause by James Ely Jr., and on the current state of the Commerce Clause by Douglas W. Kmiec.
Roger Pilon; "Politics and Law" (8 pp., 62 KB)
Mark Moller; "Introduction" (10 pp., 66 KB)
Richard A. Epstein; "The Monopolistic Vices of Progressive Constitutionalism" (28 pp., 141 KB)
James W. Ely Jr.; "'Poor Relation' Once More: The Supreme Court and the Vanishing Rights of Property Owners" (32 pp., 180 KB)
Douglas W. Kmiec; "Gonzales v. Raich: Wickard v. Filburn Displaced" (30 pp., 168 KB)
Roger Pilon; "Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales: Executive Indifference, Judicial Complicity" (24 pp., 128 KB)
Daniel E. Troy; "Do We Have a Beef With the Court? Compelled Commercial Speech Upheld, but it Could Have Been Worse" (34 pp., 183 KB)
Marci A. Hamilton; "The Establishment Clause During the 2004 Term: Big Cases, Little Movement" (28 pp., 166 KB)
John Hasnas; "The Significant Meaninglessness of Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States" (28 pp., 140 KB)
Tim Lynch; "One Cheer for United States v. Booker" (20 pp., 137 KB)
David G. Post, Annemarie Bridy and Timothy Sandefur; "'Nice Questions' Unanswered: Grokster, Sony's Staple Article of Commerce Doctrine,and the Deferred Verdict on Internet File Sharing" (28 pp., 195 KB)
Stuart Banner; "Granholm v. Heald: A Case of Wine and a Prohibition Hangover" (24 pp., 127 KB)
A. Mark Weisburd; "International Judicial Decisions, Domestic Courts, and the Foreign Affairs Power" (34 pp., 158 KB)
Jonathan H. Adler; "Looking Ahead to the 2005-2006 Term" (30 pp., 146 KB)