Edited by Ilya Shapiro
In this annual review from the Cato Institute, Ilya Shapiro and leading legal scholars analyze the 2008-2009 Supreme Court term, specifically the most important and far-reaching cases of the year, plus cases coming up. Now in its eighth edition, the Review is the first scholarly journal to appear after the term's end and the only one grounded in the nation's first principles, liberty, and limited government.
Roger Pilon; "Facial v. As-Applied Challenges: Does It Matter?" (12 pp., 69 KB)
Ilya Shapiro; "Introduction" (8 pp., 59 KB)
Randy E. Barnett; "Is the Constitution Libertarian?" (26 pp., 123 KB)
Roger Clegg; "The Future of the Voting Rights Act after Bartlett and NAMUDNO" (18 pp., 97 KB)
Kenneth L. Marcus; "The War between Disparate Impact and Equal Protection" (32 pp., 148 KB)
Roger Pilon; "Into the Pre-emption Thicket: Wyeth v. Levine" (26 pp., 124 KB)
Daniel A. Crane; "linkLine's Institutional Suspicions" (22 pp., 121 KB)
Erik Luna; "Hydraulic Pressures and Slight Deviations" (50 pp., 217 KB)
Michael Edmund O'Neill; "(Un)Reasonableness and the Roberts Court: The Fourth Amendment in Flux" (0 pp., 174 KB)
Mark Chenoweth; "Using Its Sixth Sense: The Roberts Court Revamps the Rights of the Accused" (48 pp., 213 KB)
Patrick M. Garry; "Pleasant Grove City v. Summum: The Supreme Court Finds a Public Display of the Ten Commandments to Be Permissible Government Speech" (24 pp., 123 KB)
Robert Corn-Revere; "FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.: Awaiting the Next Act" (24 pp., 124 KB)
Stephen M. Hoersting and Bradley A. Smith; "The Caperton Caper and the Kennedy Conundrum" (28 pp., 146 KB)
Jan Crawford Greenburg; "Looking Ahead: October Term 2009" (22 pp., 111 KB)