Cato Institute
1000 Massachusetts Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20001-5403

Phone (202) 842 0200
Fax (202) 842 3490
Contact Us
Support Cato

How Washington Turns Virtue into Vice

by Edward L. Hudgins

This article appeared on cato.org on January 10, 2001.

PRINT PAGE
CITE THIS
  Sans Serif
  Serif

Share with your friends:

Only in the morally sick society of Washington would the charitable actions of Linda Chavez, George Bush's nominee for labor secretary, be condemned as political vices rather than celebrated as civic virtues. Her withdrawal of her candidacy unveils the perverse policies that the new administration should target for elimination.

First, some facts. Mrs. Chavez took in Marta Mercado, a Guatemalan immigrant who had no money, no home, and few prospects for success without some initial assistance. Chavez could have handed her some money and said, "Good luck." Instead, she invited Mercado to stay in her home and gave her some spending money. (How many of us would have done that?) Apparently this was not the first time Chavez practiced such acts as charity.

Did Mercado offer to do some chores around the house? Of course she did. Even politicos cannot be so corrupt as to expect that someone with no job, no material means, and unable to speak English, who is taken in by a stranger, would not show some gratitude. But perhaps the best way that Mercado showed her gratitude was by taking English classes and taking part-time work in the neighborhood—that is, by trying to better herself and to become self-sufficient so she would not need to rely on the kindness of strangers. And all of this was done without taxpayers' dollars. What a wonderful story!

Edward L. Hudgins is director of regulatory studies at the Cato Institute.

So how did Washington turn virtues into vices and prevent Chavez from serving as Labor secretary? Through really bad laws that need to be abolished.

For instance, some critics said Chavez should have investigated Mercado more carefully to find out if she were in America illegally. But laws that deputize employers to police their workers for illegal immigrants merit repeal. The employer's job is to hire people to produce goods and services, not act as spies for the federal government. Ironically, diligent employers who suspect that every job applicant with a Spanish surname is an illegal--racial profiling?--and who shy away from hiring brown-skinned individuals whose English is not so good, might not run afoul of labor laws. But they do open themselves to federal charges of discrimination based on ethnic origin. They're damned if they do and damned if they don't.

Chavez is accused of harboring an illegal immigrant. You want to end illegal immigration? Simple: Repeal our immigration laws and open the borders to anyone who wants to come to America to live free and prosper.

America was built by immigrants. Immigrants are people who want the best out of life. They're not satisfied with the poverty, oppression, and lack of opportunity in their own countries. Immigrants are entrepreneurs. They take the initiative to move to a strange new land and to use their minds and their wits to work their way to prosperity. And immigrants are risk-takers who know that there are no assurances of success, but that if they do not try, there is no hope for the future.

So shouldn't Chavez have at least avoided the appearance of inappropriate employment by paying the Social Security and Medicare taxes on Mercado's "wages?" The answer is that the terms of employment between employer and employee should be none of the government's business. This tax burden increases the cost of employing workers, thereby killing jobs. Further, the Social Security system is an outrageous rip-off. It is unconscionable to force workers to turn over wages to a government that gives them a measly 1.5 percent annual return on investment. All could do better in a savings account or CD.

It is a sad commentary when those who value government power and control pillory people like Chavez over private acts of virtue.

Share with your friends:  

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Daily Podcast
Jennifer Burns - Ayn Rand's Affinities and Animosities
1234
OF SPECIAL NOTE

NEW BOOKS

Financial FiascoFinancial Fiasco
An easily accessible work on the economic crisis, the book guides readers through a world of irresponsible behavior, showing how many of the "solutions" being implemented are repeating the mistakes that caused the crisis.

Mad About TradeMad About Trade
This much-needed antidote to a rising tide of protectionist sentiment in the United States offers a spirited defense of free trade and tells the underreported story of how a more global U.S. economy has created better jobs and higher living standards for American workers.

The Dirty DozenThe Dirty Dozen
New in Paperback
This non-lawyer's guide to the worst Supreme Court decisions of the modern era reveals the ongoing impact these cases have on free speech, economic liberty, property rights, private contracts, and much more.

Cato Supreme Court ReviewCato Supreme Court Review
Now in its eighth year, this acclaimed annual publication brings together leading national scholars to analyze the Supreme Court's most important decisions from the term just ended and preview the year ahead.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

New Cato Journal IssueNew Cato Journal Issue
Cato Journal is America's leading free-market public policy journal. The current issue is a valuable resource for scholars concerned with questions of public policy, yet it is written and edited to be accessible to the interested lay reader.