In U.S. v. Jones, the Supreme Court has held that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle and then using the device to monitor the vehicle's movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment. What does this case mean for broader privacy protections under the Fourth Amendment? The Cato Institute's Jim Harper and Julian Sanchez assess the ruling.
Video produced by Caleb O. Brown and Austin Bragg.
Subscribe via iTunes:
Daily Podcast | Cato Video
Event Podcast | Event Videos
Subscribe via RSS:
Daily Podcast | Cato Video
Event Podcast | Event Videos
January 26, 2012
Featuring and
Download: m4v
Topics: Civil Liberties, Constitutional Studies, Police Tactics and Misconduct and Supreme Court
Browse all episodes. Filter by selecting from the options below.
To clear the search filters, click here: Reset search.