Featuring the author Thomas E. Hall, Professor of Economics, Miami University of Ohio; with comments by Jason Kuznicki, Research Fellow, Cato Institute; and Patrick McLaughlin, Mercatus Center, George Mason University; moderated by John Samples, Vice President and Publisher, Cato Institute.
It’s a judicious opinion, and now that we (once again) have different courts in different jurisdictions that have issued opposing rulings, Pruitt greatly strengthens the case for the Supreme Court to review King.
In Bootleggers & Baptists: How Economic Forces and Moral Persuasion Interact to Shape Regulatory Politics, economists Bruce Yandle and Adam Smith explain how money and morality are often combined in politics to produce arbitrary regulations benefiting cronies, while constraining productive economic activities by the general public.
Featuring: Joseph Caggiano, Senior Consultant, Chevron Energy Technology Company; David K. Bellman, Director of Fundamental Analysis, Corporate Planning and Budgeting, American Electric Power; and Richard Gordon, Professor Emeritus of Mineral Economics, Pennsylvania State University.
Last summer, the National Petroleum Council issued a report titled “Facing the Hard Truths about Energy.” The 380-page study, which was put together under the direction of former ExxonMobil CEO Lee Raymond, included the work of 350 contributors (two-thirds of whom came from outside the oil and gas field) who availed themselves of the expertise of more than 1,000 third parties involved in the energy sector. The findings? If the world is going to meet the energy demands of 2030, it will require Herculean efforts from both private and public actors. How realistic is the study’s assessment of the future? How reliable is the policy blueprint being forwarded? Joseph Caggiano and David Bellman–both of whom helped put the report together–will discuss the study’s findings, and Richard Gordon–winner of an outstanding lifetime achievement award from the International Association for Energy Economics (1992)-will provide an independent assessment.