Featuring the author Thomas E. Hall, Professor of Economics, Miami University of Ohio; with comments by Jason Kuznicki, Research Fellow, Cato Institute; and Patrick McLaughlin, Mercatus Center, George Mason University; moderated by John Samples, Vice President and Publisher, Cato Institute.
It’s a judicious opinion, and now that we (once again) have different courts in different jurisdictions that have issued opposing rulings, Pruitt greatly strengthens the case for the Supreme Court to review King.
In Bootleggers & Baptists: How Economic Forces and Moral Persuasion Interact to Shape Regulatory Politics, economists Bruce Yandle and Adam Smith explain how money and morality are often combined in politics to produce arbitrary regulations benefiting cronies, while constraining productive economic activities by the general public.
Sen. Jim DeMint,
Institute for Research on the Economics of Taxation
The President’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform, headed by former senators Connie Mack and John Breaux, delivered its report on November 1. The report included two reform alternatives: a “simplified income tax” and a “growth and investment tax.” While both plans include many pro-growth elements, they are less fundamental than leading tax reform proposals of recent years. Certainly, the panel could have done more to reduce marginal tax rates under both plans.
One of the Senate’s leading tax reformers, Jim DeMint (R-SC), will assess the panel’s proposals and discuss his more comprehensive plan, the “8.5% Tax Reform Plan.” Other top experts will examine the pros and cons of the Bush panel’s report and discuss the steps that policymakers can take to achieve major tax reforms in 2006.