The Supreme Court issued a ruling this week in the case of County of Los Angeles v. Mendez. The case involved a police shooting and the ruling involves some technical legal analysis regarding the proper application of prior Supreme Court precedents. In this post I want to take a step back from the technical legal discussion and highlight the facts of the case, which are quite sad.
In October 2010, Angel Mendez and his then pregnant girlfriend, Jennifer Garcia, were dirt poor. They lived in a one room shack, made of plywood, in the backyard of a home owned by Paula Hughes in Lancaster, California. On the awful day in question, the couple were not bothering anyone. They were actually napping in their tiny shack when their world was suddenly shattered.
Without any announcement at all, a police officer entered the shack. Startled, Angel got up and grabbed a BB gun that he kept in the shack to kill rodents and other pests. The deputy then yelled “Gun!” to alert his fellow officers of potential danger. In a moment, several police officers entered and opened fire, discharging a total of 15 rounds. Both Angel Mendez and Jennifer Garcia were shot “multiple times and suffered severe injuries.” Mr. Mendez’s right leg had to be amputated below the knee.
Two people minding their own business and in just a few moments, the police are shooting at them. The police did not accuse them of violating any law. They were totally innocent.