General Strategy and U.S. Foreign Policy

In the 21st century, instead of devoting tremendous national resources-blood and treasure-to defending the entire world against all manner of threats, the United States should behave as a normal great power. Like any great power, the United States must vigorously protect its vital national security interests using many means, including force. Absent a hegemonic threat, such as the Soviet Union, however, the United States should be able to rise above most day-to-day turmoil around the globe.

More on General Strategy and U.S. Foreign Policy

Commentary

What Kim Is Thinking: We Can Get Inside the Head of North Korea’s Leader If We Read the Signs

By Eric Gomez. New York Daily News. April 19, 2019.

Is the Trump Administration Helping the Saudis Build a Bomb?

By Doug Bandow. American Conservative. April 18, 2019.

Putin, Xi, Assad, and Maduro vs. the American Hegemon

By Ted Galen Carpenter. The American Conservative. April 15, 2019.

More Commentary

Cato Studies

The Myth of the Cyber Offense: The Case for Restraint

By Brandon Valeriano and Benjamin Jensen. Policy Analysis No. 862. January 15, 2019.

Double Game: Why Pakistan Supports Militants and Resists U.S. Pressure to Stop

By Sahar Khan. Policy Analysis No. 849. September 20, 2018.

War State, Trauma State: Why Afghanistan Remains Stuck in Conflict

By Erik Goepner. Policy Analysis No. 844. June 19, 2018.

More Cato Studies

Articles

The End of the Affair

Ted Galen Carpenter. The National Interest. No. 161. April 2019.

Paved with Good Intentions: How Washington Created the Libya Hell

Ted Galen Carpenter. Mediterranean Quarterly. Vol. 29. No. 4. December 2018.

Libertarianism, Restraint, and the Bipartisan Future

Emma Ashford. Texas National Security Review. November 30, 2018.

More Articles

Public Filings

Mandatory Universal National Service: A Dystopian Vision for a Free Society

By Doug Bandow. Testimony. February 21, 2019.

An Open Letter on BRAC

By Christopher A. Preble, Mackenzie Eaglen, and Todd Harrison. Public Comments. June 19, 2017.

U.S. National Security Strategy after Primacy: Resilience, Self-Reliance, and Restraint

By Christopher A. Preble. Testimony. October 29, 2015.

More Public Filings

Cato Reviews & Journals

Paved with Good Intentions

Policy Report. March/April 2019.

War Powers and Peace in Yemen

Rep. Ro Khanna. Policy Report. March/April 2019.

On Nonintervention and Retaliation

Robert A. Levy. Policy Report. March/April 2019.

More Reviews & Journals

Events

Cyber Warfare, Coercion, and Restraint

Featuring Brandon Valeriano, Benjamin Jensen, Jacquelyn Schneider, Richard Harknett, & John Glaser. May 9, 2019. Policy Forum.

Two Roads to War: How (and Why) America and Britain Decided to Invade Iraq

Featuring Patrick Porter, Michael Mazarr, Colonel Lawrence B. Wilkerson (Ret.), & Christopher A. Preble. April 24, 2019. Book Forum.

Gullible Superpower: U.S. Support for Bogus Foreign Democratic Movements

Featuring . March 19, 2019. Book Forum.

More Events

Speeches

Shadow Force: Private Security Contractors in Iraq

By David Isenberg. February 16, 2009.

Has the Privatization of National Security Gone Too Far?

By David Isenberg. November 14, 2008.

US-China trade relations and its impact on religious activity in the PRC

By Ned Graham. June 15, 1999.

More Speeches

Downsizing the Federal Government

Rightsizing U.S. Ground Forces

By Christopher A. Preble. November 2010.