Getting it Right on Immigration

March 7, 2007 • Commentary
This article appeared in OCRe​g​is​ter​.com on March 7, 2007.

Prospects for comprehensive immigration reform are on the rise in the new Democratic‐​controlled Congress. Voters in November failed to rally around the tough anti‐​immigration rhetoric of the Republican House majority. The new Democratic leadership has shown itself more open to expanding legal channels for immigrant workers.

Nonetheless, momentum is building for major reform – and not a minute too soon. In testimony March 1 before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez remarked that our dynamic economy continues to create jobs for low‐​skilled workers as well as higher‐​skilled ones, yet the number of Americans willing to fill lower‐​end jobs continues to shrink.

From 1996–2004, the number of adult Americans without a high school education – the demographic group that typically fills low‐​skilled jobs – fell by 4.6 million. The biggest flaw in our current immigration system is its lack of a sufficient legal channel for low‐​skilled immigrants who are crucial to filling that gap between demand and supply on the lower rungs of the labor ladder. In the face of those powerful economic and demographic trends, federal enforcement efforts have failed to stem the inflow of low‐​skilled immigrants.

Because of the cost and risk of crossing the border, the still‐​large number of illegal immigrants who make it across are more likely to stay for an extended period once here. Enforcement efforts have perversely increased the illegal population by reducing what had historically been a circular flow of migration from and back to Mexico.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, after reporting the administration’s increased efforts at border enforcement, told the panel that an enforcement‐​only policy cannot work. He called on Congress to create a temporary‐​worker program so that foreign workers can legally fill jobs U.S. workers do not want.

“This regulated channel for temporary workers would dramatically reduce the pressure on our borders, aid our economy and ease the task of our law enforcement agents inside the country,” Chertoff said.

For immigration reform to succeed, it must contain a workable temporary‐​worker program. Such a program must create a sufficient number of visas to meet the needs of the U.S. economy. A crucial flaw in the McCain‐​Kennedy immigration reform passed by the Senate last May was that it capped annual visas at 200,000, far below the actual demand of the U.S. labor market.

The Labor Department projects our economy will continue to create a net 400,000 or more low‐​skilled jobs annually in service sectors like food preparation, cleaning, construction, landscaping and retail. Any visa cap below the actual demand in our economy will only perpetuate illegal immigration.

True reforms must also avoid stifling labor regulations that discourage legal hiring. Union leaders are pressuring Democrats to require that temporary workers be paid “prevailing wages” – that is, artificially high, union‐​level wages rather than market wages. This would be a recipe for failure, since many of the jobs filled by immigrant workers are low‐​skilled, low‐​wage jobs that would simply not exist in the legal economy if union‐​level wages were mandated. Adding cumbersome labor rules will only perpetuate the underground labor market that has been created by the current system.

Finally, any reform worthy of the name must offer a path to legalization for the millions of undocumented workers already in our economy and society. Deporting them all would be impractical – to say nothing of an economic and humanitarian disaster – yet continuing indefinitely with millions living in a legal twilight zone is also unacceptable.

Opponents of immigration will label any legalization plan as “amnesty,” but the smear is inaccurate for most ideas on the table. Those gaining legal status would be required to pay a fine and back taxes, and they could also be required to return briefly to their home countries to apply for legal entry.

Waiting won’t make the problem go away.

About the Author
Daniel Griswold
Former Director, Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies