June 11, 2008 5:07PM 

# We’re #14! We’re #14! 

By [Michael F. Cannon](https://www.cato.org/people/michael-f-cannon) 

---

<a class="js-popover-trigger cursor-pointer popover-trigger" data-bs-placement="bottom" data-bs-trigger="click" id="popover-trigger"> 

SHARE 

</a> 

Last year, I [reported](https://www.cato.org/2007/07/03/catolibertys-health-care-content-ranked-24/) that Cato@Liberty was ranked #24 on the [health​care100​.com](http://www.edrugsearch.com/edsblog/healthcare100/) rankings of health care blogs. As of June 9, 2008, we’ve rocketed all the way up to #14. [Matthew Holt](http://www.thehealthcareblog.com/), you’re still on notice.

Sure, there may be [problems](https://www.cato.org/2007/07/03/catolibertys-health-care-content-ranked-24/) with [health​care100​.com](http://www.edrugsearch.com/edsblog/healthcare100/)’s methodology that tilt the rankings in our favor. But like a leftist reading a [World Health Organization report](https://www.cato.org/pubs/bp/bp101.pdf), I’m just going to assume that everything’s fair and balanced.

##### Related Tags 

[General](https://www.cato.org/general), [Health Care](https://www.cato.org/health-care) 

[![Creative Commons License](/build/cato_2020/images/creative-commons.svg)](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) 
This work is licensed under a [Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).