# *Bennett v. AFSCME*

For workers to validly waive their right not to support a union, someone must inform them of that right.

August 26, 2021 • Legal Briefs 

By Jacob Huebert, [Ilya Shapiro](https://www.cato.org/people/ilya-shapiro), and [Trevor Burrus](https://www.cato.org/people/trevor-burrus) 

[ 

Download PDF 

](https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2021-08/Bennett%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf) 

Learn more about [Cato’s Amicus Briefs Program](/about/cato-amicus-program).

Susan Bennett is employed by the Moline-Cole Valley School District in Illinois. She didn’t want to be a member of the union, but at the time public school teachers unions were allowed to deduct “agency fees” from non-members’ wages. Agency fees were supposedly a method of preserving dissenting teachers’ rights to not support the unions’ political activities while still compelling payment for unions’ “core” collective bargaining activities. So Ms. Bennett, even as a non-member, still had to pay.

Then, in a case called *Janus* decided in 2018, the Supreme Court ruled that agency fees were an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment. Shortly after that ruling, Ms. Bennett tried to get her money back—money that was unconstitutionally taken from her. The union advised her, however, that she could not revoke her union dues authorization until a specific “window period.” Her next opportunity to submit a written request to revoke these deductions would be from July 27, 2019, to August 11, 2019. In the meantime, the union would continue to deduct the fees.

The *Janus* decision said that employees had to freely give consent to waive their First Amendment rights and allow unions to collect fees. Here the Ms. Bennett signed her union membership agreement prior to that decision, and therefore could not have knowingly waived a right not yet recognized by the Supreme Court. She has thus petitioned the Supreme Court, arguing that the union continued to violate her rights despite the clear rules of the *Janus* decision.

Cato has joined the Goldwater Institute on a brief supporting Ms. Bennett’s petition. We argue that, for workers to validly waive their right not to support a union, someone must inform them of that right. But, since *Janus*, unions have taken steps to ensure their members don’t know their First Amendment rights. In fact, the practice is so widespread that courts should not even treat a union membership agreement as establishing a valid waiver of a worker’s First Amendment rights. The Supreme Court should take Ms. Bennett’s case to ensure that unions do not continue to undercut the *Janus* decision.

[![Bennett v. AFSCME brief cover](/sites/cato.org/files/styles/serial_cover_phone/public/2021-08/legal-brief-8-27-2021.jpg?itok=J6aASjus)](https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2021-08/Bennett%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf) 

### Download This Legal Brief

##### *Bennett v. AFSCME* 

[ 

Download PDF 

](https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2021-08/Bennett%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf) 

##### About the Authors 

##### Jacob Huebert 

President, Liberty Justice Center

[![Ilya Shapiro](/sites/cato.org/files/styles/author_picture/public/2021-01/Ilya%20Shapiro.jpg?itok=m1_rdWBG)](/people/ilya-shapiro) 

##### [Ilya Shapiro](/people/ilya-shapiro)

Former Vice President and Director, Robert A. Levy Center for Constitutional Studies, Cato Institute

[![Trevor Burrus](/sites/cato.org/files/styles/author_picture/public/2021-01/Trevor%20Burrus.jpg?itok=onKmjXsL)](/people/trevor-burrus) 

##### [Trevor Burrus](/people/trevor-burrus)

Former Research Fellow, Robert A. Levy Center for Constitutional Studies, Cato Institute

[ 

](https://twitter.com/TCBurrus) 

[![Creative Commons License](/build/cato_2020/images/creative-commons.svg)](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) 
This work is licensed under a [Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). 

[ 

Download PDF 

](https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2021-08/Bennett%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf)