Book Forum 

# *Rehabilitating* Lochner*: Defending Individual Rights against Progressive Reform*

(Cato Institute and the University of Chicago Press, 2011)

##### Watch the Event 

[![QuickTime](/weekly/quicktime.gif)](https://cdn.cato.org/archive-2011/cbf-05-02-11.mp4)[Watch the Event in QuickTime (M4V)](https://cdn.cato.org/archive-2011/cbf-05-02-11.mp4) 
[![ipod](/images/icons/ipod.jpg)](https://cdn.cato.org/archive-2011/cbfa-05-02-11.mp3)[Download a Podcast of the Event (MP3)](https://cdn.cato.org/archive-2011/cbfa-05-02-11.mp3) 

Join the conversation on X using [\#CatoEvents](https://x.com/hashtag/CatoEvents). Follow [@CatoInstitute](https://x.com/catoinstitute) on X to get future event updates, live streams, and videos from the Cato Institute.

Date and Time 

May 2, 2011 4 - 5:30 PM EDT 

Location 

Hayek Auditorium 

Share This Event 

##### Featuring 

Featuring the author **David E. Bernstein**, George Mason University School of Law; with comments by **Louis Michael Seidman**, Georgetown University Law Center; and **Gregory E. Maggs**, George Washington University School of Law; moderated by **Roger Pilon**, Cato Institute. 

[ [![Media Name: rehabilitatinglochner.jpg](/sites/cato.org/files/styles/optimized/public/download-remote-images/www.cato.org/138620933958/rehabilitatinglochner.jpg?itok=Dghx8m7e)](/sites/cato.org/files/download-remote-images/www.cato.org/138620933958/rehabilitatinglochner.jpg) 

Purchase Book](https://www.cato.org/store/books/rehabilitating-lochner-defending-individual-rights-against-progressive-reform)

No Supreme Court decision concerning economic liberty has been more emblematic of the alleged errors of the “old,” pre-New Deal Court than *Lochner v. New York*, decided in 1905. Upholding contractual freedom against a New York statute that limited the hours that bakers might work, the decision has been reviled by both liberals and conservatives as an egregious example of judicial malfeasance — cited today most often for the prescient dissent of the sainted Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. Yet the story of *Lochner* is not over. In a new book that examines the history and background of the case, David Bernstein argues that the decision has been widely misunderstood and unfairly maligned, that it was well grounded in precedent, and that subsequent battles over segregation laws, sex discrimination, civil liberties, and more owe much to the limited-government ideas of *Lochner*’s proponents. Please join us for what is bound to be a lively discussion about this important new book.

[![Creative Commons License](/build/cato_2020/images/creative-commons.svg)](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) 
This work is licensed under a [Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).