Policy Forum 

# Do Landowners Have a Right to Challenge Federal Regulation of Their Property? A Preview of *Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes* on the Eve of Oral Argument 

##### Watch the Event 

Download:

[ 

Video 

](https://fastly-unsigned-us-east-1-prod.brightcovecdn.com/media/v1/pmp4/static/clear/6039378657001/5012742f-500f-49db-b73c-51c161cb6e9f/ef118cb7-10ba-46f2-aa66-5edb624efb35/main.mp4) 

[ 

Video 

](https://cdn.cato.org/archive-2016/cpf-03-14-16.mp4) 

[ 

Audio 

](https://cdn.cato.org/archive-2016/cpfa-03-14-16.mp3) 

**If you can’t make it to the event, you can watch it live online at [www​.cato​.org/live](http://www.cato.org/live) and join the conversation on Twitter using [\#CatoPropRights](https://twitter.com/hashtag/CatoPropRights). Follow [@CatoEvents](https://twitter.com/catoevents) on Twitter to get future event updates, live streams, and videos from the Cato Institute.** 

Date and Time 

March 14, 2016 12 - 1:30 PM EDT 

Share This Event 

##### Featuring 

Featuring **Shauneen Werlinger**, Legal Fellow, Pacific Legal Foundation; **Steven Eagle**, Professor, George Mason University School of Law; and **Trevor Burrus**, Research Fellow, Cato Institute; moderated by **Ilya Shapiro**, Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies, Cato Institute. 

Four years ago, in [*Sackett v. EPA*](http://www.pacificlegal.org/old-site/document.doc?id=612) (2012), the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the EPA’s effort to deny judicial review of its determination that a rural lot where an Idaho couple was building their home was a federal wetland. The Army Corps of Engineers makes tens of thousands of similar wetlands determinations each year under the Clean Water Act (CWA), but it claims that *Sackett* doesn’t apply because these determinations are legally different from the EPA’s orders. On March 30, the Supreme Court will hear argument in [*U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co.*](https://www.pacificlegal.org/When-regulators-label-property-as-wetlands-owners-may-seek-judicial-review) to decide whether landowners have access to court to challenge agency rulings that their property contains wetlands that are subject to federal regulation. While 30 states are now suing to overturn the newest CWA rule expanding power over “[waters of the United States](http://blog.pacificlegal.org/plf-sues-the-corps-and-epa-over-expansive-water-rule/),” invalidating that rule won’t change *existing* federal control over individual landowners if the agencies continue to assert similarly overbroad authority. What recourse do landowners have when federal agencies decide that private property contains wetlands? According to the Obama administration, landowners first must spend hundreds of thousands of dollars and many years seeking a permit from the same officials who may not have the proper regulatory authority to begin with. The Supreme Court rejected that approach in *Sackett*. A win for Hawkes here would provide much broader relief from abusive agency rulings and procedures.

[![Creative Commons License](/build/cato_2020/images/creative-commons.svg)](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) 
This work is licensed under a [Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).