Capitol Hill Briefing 

# Could Oklahoma’s New Lawsuit Strike a Fatal Blow to Obamacare? 

##### Watch the Event 

[![QuickTime](/weekly/quicktime.gif)](https://cdn.cato.org/archive-2012/chb-10-17-12.mp4)[Watch the Event in QuickTime (M4V)](https://cdn.cato.org/archive-2012/chb-10-17-12.mp4) 
[![ipod](/images/icons/ipod.jpg)](https://cdn.cato.org/archive-2012/chba-10-17-12.mp3)[Download a Podcast of the Event (MP3)](https://cdn.cato.org/archive-2012/chba-10-17-12.mp3) 

Join the conversation on X using [\#CatoEvents](https://x.com/hashtag/CatoEvents). Follow [@CatoInstitute](https://x.com/catoinstitute) on X to get future event updates, live streams, and videos from the Cato Institute.

Date and Time 

October 17, 2012 12:30 - 2 PM EDT 

Location 

1310 Longworth House Office Building 

Share This Event 

##### Featuring 

Featuring **Jonathan Adler**, Professor, Case Western Reserve University School of Law; **Michael F. Cannon**, Director of Health Policy Studies, Cato Institute; and **Timothy S. Jost**, Professor, Washington and Lee University School of Law; moderated by **Laura Odato**, Director of Government Affairs, Cato Institute. 

Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt has filed a lawsuit alleging the Obama administration is violating the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and imposing illegal taxes in states such as Oklahoma. As Jonathan H. Adler and Michael F. Cannon detail in their forthcoming *Health Matrix* article, “[Taxation Without Representation: The Illegal IRS Rule to Expand Tax Credits under the PPACA](http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2106789),” the PPACA cannot function without state buy-in. The Obama administration’s response to state push-back has been to rewrite the statute by imposing, on both employers and individuals, taxes that Congress never authorized. Pruitt is challenging the IRS rule that imposes those illegal taxes. Supporters and opponents agree the PPACA’s “[entire structure](http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2012/07/18/tax-credits-in-federally-facilitated-exchanges-are-consistent-with-the-affordable-care-acts-language-and-history/)” depends on the IRS’s interpretation of the statute, and that this dispute “[could be a fatal blow to Obamacare](http://healthblog.ncpa.org/this-could-be-a-fatal-blow-to-obamacare/).”