Book Forum 

# *Are Liberty and Equality Compatible?*

(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

##### Watch the Event 

Download:

[ 

Video 

](https://fastly-unsigned-us-east-1-prod.brightcovecdn.com/media/v1/pmp4/static/clear/6039378657001/691b42a8-230b-4b63-8ba4-9d80a90b2452/b792c239-5a80-45aa-8f85-1b2af554b9cf/main.mp4) 

[ 

Video 

](https://cdn.cato.org/archive-2010/cbf-08-03-10.mp4) 

[ 

Audio 

](https://cdn.cato.org/archive-2010/cbfa-08-03-10.mp3) 

Join the conversation on X using [\#CatoEvents](https://x.com/hashtag/CatoEvents). Follow [@CatoInstitute](https://x.com/catoinstitute) on X to get future event updates, live streams, and videos from the Cato Institute.

Date and Time 

August 3, 2010 12 - 2 PM EDT 

Location 

1st floor/Wintergarden 

Share This Event 

##### Featuring 

Featuring the dueling authors **Jan Narveson**, University of Waterloo; and **James P. Sterba**, University of Notre Dame; moderated by **David Boaz**, Executive Vice President, Cato Institute. 

[[![Are Liberty and Equality Compatible?](/sites/cato.org/files/styles/optimized/public/download-remote-images/www.cato.org/74509063558/AreLibertyEqualityCover.jpg?itok=z3E9GczT)](/sites/cato.org/files/download-remote-images/www.cato.org/74509063558/AreLibertyEqualityCover.jpg)](http://www.amazon.com/dp/0521883822/?tag=catoinstitute-20) 
[Purchase book](http://www.amazon.com/dp/0521883822/?tag=catoinstitute-20) 

Are the political ideals of liberty and equality compatible? This question is of central and continuing importance in political philosophy, moral philosophy, and welfare economics. In this book, two distinguished philosophers take up the debate. Jan Narveson, author of [*The Libertarian Idea*](http://www.amazon.com/dp/1551114216/?tag=catoinstitute-20), argues that a political ideal of negative liberty is incompatible with any substantive ideal of equality; while James P. Sterba, author of [*Justice for Here and Now*](http://www.amazon.com/dp/0521621887/?tag=catoinstitute-20), argues that Narveson’s own ideal of negative liberty is compatible with, and in fact leads to the requirements of, a substantive ideal of equality. Of course, they cannot both be right. Thus, the details of their arguments about the political ideal of negative liberty and its requirements will determine which of them is right. Their debate will be of value to all who are interested in the central issue of what are the practical requirements of a political ideal of liberty.

[![Creative Commons License](/build/cato_2020/images/creative-commons.svg)](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) 
This work is licensed under a [Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).